What does it mean to “implement personalized learning”?
We believe personalized learning implementation should emphasize on student-centered classrooms.
As discussed in previous posts, it depends on your understanding of personalized learning, and your belief in student-driven instruction.
Here, we list seven components of personalized learning. Understanding these components would help you design classroom programs that allow students to study more concepts and learn with lesser effort. And, it would let you introduce rigorous and high-quality learning standards in your classroom.
7 Components of personalized learning
1. Learning path
Traditional classrooms offer a single learning path to all students – gifted or at-risk they are taught the same standards at the same pace.
Personalized learning, however, offers students multiple learning paths. These Learning paths are decided on the base of a diagnostic test and what they need to master by the end of the grade.
2. Flexibility of learning environment
Traditional classrooms have fixed schedules and a well-established classroom set-up.
Personalized learning forces the administrators to rethink the physical environment and the classroom structure. School schedules are reinvented to create an environment that supports the students study at a pace comfortable to them.
3. Student Profiles
Merely being aware of students’ learning preferences, such as their learning styles, is not of much use.
Traditional classroom set-up uses student profiles only to design intervention sessions. However, personalized learning makes active use of student profiles. The everyday lesson plans take account of individual student profiles, and make use of the available data to ensure maximum student growth.
True learning is a product of interaction – Student-student, student-teacher and teacher-teacher interactions. Interactions are necessary for ensuring long-term retention.
Good personalized learning necessarily builds over this reality. It connects students with other stakeholders, such as peers, parents, and teachers – and ensures meaningful interactions.
5. Student oriented progression
Traditional classrooms force students to progress at the teacher’s pace. A teacher may increase and decrease the pace to accommodate students, yet it remains a teacher-oriented approach.
On the other hand, student oriented progression takes account of individual proficiency levels, and thus fuels student growth.
6. Diverse resource bank
In a personalized learning environment, lessons are designed to ensure that students have access to learning material that best suits their strengths. For instance, students with a dominant auditory learning style receive access to audio files, while those with a strong read-write learning style are provided with the access to a number of books and practice tools.
7. Diagnostic assessments
Traditional summative assessments only gauge what students have learned. They are comprehensive in nature. This makes it difficult for the administrators to draw usable inferences from such assessments.
Diagnostic assessments, however, can gauge proficiency level, content mastery, and diagnose students’ strengths and weaknesses. Administrators can find out what students needs to learn. Such formative data can be used to adjust lesson plans; design interventions; and it can guide acceleration programs too.
The concept of personalized learning is a little complex than the traditional approach to classroom learning; nevertheless, as the focus shifts towards increasing the vigor and complexity of what students are taught – it’s better to modify the classroom that invites students to take charge of their own learning. Personalized learning is one of the best approaches to ensure that.
We encourage you to explore PracTutor. PracTutor helps students practice at their own pace by personalizing their learning path. It provides students with several accommodations which ensure that students can master Math and Language arts.